Paul Rubin wrote: > "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Of course it's legal for non-monopoly companies. You seem to think >>> Microsoft's illegal monopoly is an irrelevant detail. It is not. >> What is an "illegal monopoly"? > It's what Microsoft still stands convicted of having. > > http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/openlaw/msdoj/ I don't see anything there about what an "illegal monopoly" is or might be. Perhaps you could clarify. What do you think you mean when you say "illegal monopoly"? DS -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
