Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alex's solution doesn't require special treatment for disaster > recovery and/or planning, and as such is a valid answer to the
I'm not sure I understand this. I would assume that any software (or, for that matter, data) of any substantial importance, worthy of being deployed on a server, does include disaster planning (and recovery plans, in particular) as a routine part of server-side deployment (regular backups with copies off-site, etc etc). Of course, server side deployment DOES make it considerably easier to enjoy such crucial services, compared with client side deployment; but I had not addressed such issues at all in my original posts on this thread (in terms of "IP protection", a "fat client" with data kept client-side might be just as suitable as a "thin client" for server-side deployment... but it would be just as vulnerable as a wholly client-side deployment to issues of [lack of] disaster planning etc). So, I may perhaps be misunderstanding what you're saying about "my solution"...? Alex -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
