[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Xiao Jianfeng wrote: > > >> I have compared the two methods, >> (1). "for x in fh:" >> (2). read all the file into memory firstly. >> >> I have tested the two methods on two files, one is 80M and the second >>one is 815M. >> The first method gained a speedup of about 40% for the first file, and >>a speedup >> of about 25% for the second file. >> >> Sorry for my bad English, and I hope I haven't made people confused. >> >> > >So is the problem solved ? > > Yes, thank you.
>Putting buffering implementation aside, (1) is the way to go as it runs >through content only once. > > > I think so :-) Regards, xiaojf -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
