<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> He seems to want scanl

Yes.  But it's not in Python, right?
(I know about Keller's version.)

Robert Kern wrote:
> Define better. More accurate? Less code?

Good point.
As Bonono (?) suggested: I'd most like a solution that
relies on a built-in to give me both of those.
(Pretty is good too.)  Like SciPy's cumsum.

Thanks,
Alan Isaac


-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to