Op 2005-11-24, Simon Brunning schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 24 Nov 2005 11:30:04 GMT, Antoon Pardon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > But he's consistently a >> > better judge of language design than I am, and in all likelihood >> > better than you, too. If you like Python, it's 'cos you like the >> > decisions he's made over many years. >> >> So, that makes that about a lot of things we think alike. Remains >> the question about whose ideas are better about the things we >> disagree. > > It might remain for *you* to see the answer to that question. I susp > ect that most of us have answered it to our own satisfaction long since.
<Shrug> There was a time that Guido and I disagreed about the ternary operator. I'm sure people then also answered the question who of us was wrong to their satisfaction. In the mean time Guido seems to have changed his mind. The way it looks to me right now, is that python is evolving the way I like it to evolve, even if newsgroup members in general oppose those ideas when I defend them in the newsgroup. -- Antoon Pardon -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
