"Giovanni Bajo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mike Meyer wrote: >>> Björn Lindström wrote: >>> Why do you think we have a frozenset, for instance? By Mike's >>> argument, we shouldn't have it. >> Not *my* arguments, certainly. Not unless you're seriously >> misinterpreting them. > Sorry then, I probably am. There must be a misunderstanding somewhere.
I'm seeing posts from you attribute to "Mike Meyer" (me) and "Mike" - some of which definitely weren't me. So maybe it wasn't mine. > What is your position about frozenset? By my understanding of your arguments, > it is a hand-cuffed version of set, which just prevents bugs that could still > be caught by testing. I have exactly the same problem with frozensets as I do with sets - I can't add attributes to either one. That frozenset can't be changed doesn't bother me particularly. > The same applies for the arbitrary restriction of not allowing sets > to be key dictionaries (with their hash value being their id). I can't parse that. What do you mean by "key dictionaries"? <mike -- Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list