Mike Meyer wrote: > So why the $*@& (please excuse my Perl) does "for x in 1, 2, 3" work?
because the syntax says so:
http://docs.python.org/ref/for.html
> Seriously. Why doesn't this have to be phrased as "for x in list((1,
> 2, 3))", just like you have to write list((1, 2, 3)).count(1), etc.?
because anything that supports [] can be iterated over.
</F>
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
