[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) writes: > You could make a case for a "2D coordinate" class being "sufficiently > primitive" to have immutable instances, of course (by analogy with > numbers and strings) -- in that design, you would provide no mutators, > and therefore neither would you provide setters (with any syntax) for x > and y, obviously. However, a framework for 2D geometry entirely based > on immutable-instance classes would probably be unwieldy
I could imagine using Python's built-in complex numbers to represent 2D points. They're immutable, last I checked. I don't see a big conflict. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
