Donn Cave wrote:
> Really, this kind of abstraction of data types is not only well
> supported in Haskell, it can be almost a curse, at least for
> someone like myself who has fairly superficial experience with
> this kind of programming.  After all the functions have been
> zealously scrubbed clean of any trace of concrete data types and
> rendered maximally abstract, they can be a little hard to understand.
>
My experience too. An interesting thing I experienced with Haskell is
that even though it is strongly and statically typed, I seldom think
about data types when writing programs, kind of typeless to me.

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to