Donn Cave wrote: > Really, this kind of abstraction of data types is not only well > supported in Haskell, it can be almost a curse, at least for > someone like myself who has fairly superficial experience with > this kind of programming. After all the functions have been > zealously scrubbed clean of any trace of concrete data types and > rendered maximally abstract, they can be a little hard to understand. > My experience too. An interesting thing I experienced with Haskell is that even though it is strongly and statically typed, I seldom think about data types when writing programs, kind of typeless to me.
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list