Gerhard Häring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bo Peng wrote: >> Dear list, >> Is there a better way than doing >> try: >> import aModule >> except: >> has_aModule = False >> else: >> has_aModule = True >> The main concern here is that loading aModule is unnecessary (and >> may take time). > > No, there is not really a better way. > > You *could* check for the existance of files, but a file existing and > it really being successfully loadable as a module are not the same. > > Besides, it is a lot of work to reimplement half the Python import > machinery just for checking for all kinds of files. If you're serious > about it, you also need to cope with modules loadable from ZIP files, > and with .pth files, etc. > > This is not fun to program, and you're really better off just checking > for a successful import like you're doing now.
I don't think the above is entirely correct. imp.find_module() probably does what the OP needs. Thomas -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
