[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > And I have around one year to wait for Ruby to get rid of the nasty > syntax copied from Perl and make it look as beautiful as Python .... > Then I'll consider switching. ;) > > Ummm, I'm sorry, did you say clean reflective meta-model???
yes. > So this: > > caller[0] =~ /in `([^']+)'/ ? $1 : '(anonymous)' > > vs. the python example: > > filename, line, fname, source = traceback.extract_stack(limit=2)[0] > return fname > > is what you call clean?? Hmmm ... interesting. no, It is not. I've not yet defined what I would call the "clean way". - both code examples were provided from the community (limited responses from python community). - Ruby does not pass the evaluation, too (although it is closer, due to the clean metadata capability). - And: Ruby has even lower evolution speed: http://lazaridis.com/core/eval/ruby.html . -- http://lazaridis.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
