[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Currently I'm on 149 characters in <urgh> one line - 128 without > spaces/newlines. (it'd be three characters shorter if it didn't have > to end with a "\n")
It'll be interesting to see what the short 1-line answers look like. I have a hard time seeing how that's done. It'll especially be interesting to see if we're all using similar tricks or if the multiline attemps take a distinctly different tack than the single line attempts. Currently, I'm down to 137 characters now in 6 lines. There's very little left to trim at this point, so I don't know that I'll be able to knock it down any further using my current approach. And since I don't have any other approaches in the wings, I may be about washed up. -tim -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
