Tim Hochberg wrote: >> I am currently at 39 bytes following the requirements and the >> principle given above (my module passes the test). Anyone able to beat >> that?
> Wow! It'll be interesting to see how to do that. The obvious way gives > 53 bytes. Hmmm, I'll have to see what can be done... 39 bytes... 53 bytes... It gives me the impression to follow a jet plane with a bike with my 179 bytes! There isn't a single superfluous byte. My code is so compressed that the syntactic colorizer can't cope any more. I definitively need a new algorythm. <g> -- ================== Remi Villatel [EMAIL PROTECTED] ================== -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
