Martin P. Hellwig wrote: > Ilias Lazaridis wrote: >> Martin P. Hellwig wrote: >>> Ilias Lazaridis wrote: >>> <cut> >>> So I guess you volunteer http://www.python.org/psf/volunteer.html ? >> >> I volunteer and contribute already (with a general validity and python >> specific analysis) >> >> A mediator should communicate the findings and suggestion (after >> verifying them) to the responsibles / community: >> >> http://lazaridis.com/efficiency/process.html#mediator >> >> This would include to pass the relevant ones to the list you've >> mentioned: >> >> http://www.python.org/psf/volunteer.html >> >> - >> >> TAG.efficiency.process.mediator > > Last time I checked a "mediator" otherwise known to me as a > communication manager, is only effective when he/she is recognized as > authoritative by the participating group _and_ him/herself.
ok > As from other posts I read that the last part is the issue, well since > this is a voluntary bunch of people with a slightly social democratic > architecture you fall back on spokesman and that can be anybody, > including or perhaps even especially you. ok > The only thing that holds "you" theoretically back is "acknowledged > authority by the participating group _and_ yourself" and of course the > resource for "restricted" information. what do you mean by "resource for "restricted" information"? > For the first part you got my vote, for second, well that should grow in > time. second part = "resource for "restricted" information" ? - (you can use private email if you prefere. If so, I will post an summary back to the thread). - [sidenote: I am currently preparing diagramms, which will demonstrate the several processes more clearly.] . -- http://lazaridis.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list