On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:21:59 -0600, Brian van den Broek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Gerard Brunick said unto the world upon 08/01/06 01:27 PM:
>> My way is ugly. These has to be a better way.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gerard
>
>If you'd posted your way, I might well have seen if I could do it in a
>nicer fashion. But, since for all I know, my best efforts would result
>in the approach you already have, I'm unlikely to put the effort in.
>
>I suspect I'm not alone. You might do well to show the approach you
>are unhappy with.
>
OTOH, he's probably just trying to get someone to remember zip-abuse for him.
Hope it's not homework ;-)
>>> sq = [[r+c for c in 'abc'] for r in '123']
>>> for r in sq: print r
...
['1a', '1b', '1c']
['2a', '2b', '2c']
['3a', '3b', '3c']
>>> for r in (zip(*sq)): print r
...
('1a', '2a', '3a')
('1b', '2b', '3b')
('1c', '2c', '3c')
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
