Paul Rubin <http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > For finite sequences, your proposal adds nothing new to existing > > solutions like range and xrange. > > Oh come on, [5,4,..0] is much easier to read than range(5,-1,-1). But not easier than reversed(range(6)) [[the 5 in one of the two expressions in your sentence has to be an offbyone;-)]] Alex -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
