Steven D'Aprano wrote: > I beg to differ: Python *allows* people to create classes if they're keen > on the syntax (and I can sympathise with that like), but Python > *encourages* by example generic tools that operate on as many different > types as makes sense.
But these generic tools (say the "pow" function) in turn simply use the methods defined by the classes. -- Christoph -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
