Christoph Zwerschke wrote:
> Claudio Grondi wrote:
>
>> There is no symbol coming to my mind, but I would be glad if it would
>> express, that 'a' becomes a reference to a Python object being
>> currently referred by the identifier 'b' (maybe some kind of <-> ?).
>
>
> With unicode, you have a lot of possibilities to express this:
>
> a ← b # a = b
> a ⇐ b # a = copy(b)
> a ⇚ b # a = deepcopy(b)
^-- with this above also the notation
a ← b # a = b
starts to be obvious to me, as it covers also some of the specifics of
Python.
Nice idea.
Claudio
>>
>> -- Christoph
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
