Here's what I think should go in the standard library: - A set of battle-hardened WSGI gateways (CherryPy's WSGI server, ISAPI-WSGI, mpcp, PEP-333's CGI gateway, flup's fastcgi and scgi support). I think that if we included a WSGI app server with a snazzy administration user interface (ala ColdFusion), it would be a pretty cool thing to have.
- Defined WSGI middleware API for common components of many web frameworks. For example, most frameworks need to map a request to a piece of code somewhere. Many need to use a "pull" templating model. Many need to load configuration values, etc. Web-sig should define an API and a set of environ WSGI keys to implement all this functionality in a pluggable manner. I made a stab at that here: http://subway.python-hosting.com/wiki/Genweb -peter hunt Kay Schluehr skrev: > I'd be interested in what people think about bundling one of the > diverse Python webframeworks with the Python distribution which will be > "just there" as like Tcl/Tk+Tkinter for GUI-programming. Its not that I > don't trust people to make qualified decisions on their own or that I > actually believe in one single best solution. It's more a symbolic > action of bundling forces and attention. > > Kay -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
