"robin" wrote: > Overall, the look is very "safe corporate". I myself would have gone > for a funkier (though still elegant) look. The energy of the Python > community is not being communicated. The vim of the language is > diluted. This is not playing to Python's strengths. > > Yes, i have been known to do this for a living. Had I been aware > earlier, I would have been happy to help with the redesign. How > can I now?
you can either try joining the beta.python.org cathedral (good luck), or drop by the skunkworks (http://effbot.org/zone/pydotorg.htm) and help me whip together some nice templates. (if I could pick a style, I'd go for something that has some visual connection to the existing site style, but reworked for 2006 and today's Python universe). </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
