Terry Hancock wrote: > Note also in the datasets that *overperformers* *underrated* > their performance.
Well, if you're the best in the group and aren't perfectly exact in your evaluation of your position relative to others, you can't overrate yourself. It's quite natural that the self evaluation curve would be flatter than the actual curve, since "noise" will drive the curve towards the middle, and it's also natural that the bad performers are also less good at evaluating their own work, but the strange thing is that the lowest quartile has higher self- evaluation than the second lowest. I can't say my general picture of coworkers generally support *this*, but I supect we've all run across people who were incompetent and unaware of it now and then... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
