John J. Lee wrote:
> I guess the same is true of Python in some respects: it's still
> incrementally changing (more than C++, I guess), and isn't all that
> much younger than C++ (around 15 and 23 years old respectively).

But C++ is almost entirely backwards compatible with C, which
adds another dozen years or so...
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to