Lee Leahu wrote: > > Yes. You don't need one thread per connection: > > http://docs.python.org/lib/module-asyncore.html > > I am running into a problem where asyncore is through a filedescriptor > error if I try to launch more that 1023 connections: > ------------------------------------ > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "./test.py", line 46, in ? > asyncore.loop() > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 192, in loop > poll_fun(timeout, map) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 122, in poll > r, w, e = select.select(r, w, e, timeout) > ValueError: filedescriptor out of range in select() > ------------------------------------ > > Is there a limitation on the number of simultaneous connects that can > be made with asyncore ?
what does "ulimit -n" (max number of file descriptors) say on your machine? if it says 1024, that's what you're seeing. to increase this, you have to reconfigure your OS. if you get a larger value, you can try passing use_poll=True to the asyncore.loop function. if use_poll doesn't work, you may have to rebuild Python's select module to support more handles. see the comments at the top of Modules/selectmodule.c for details. </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
