John Salerno wrote: > Jonathan Gardner wrote: >> You may want to read >> http://python.org/doc/2.4.2/whatsnew/whatsnew24.html to get an idea of >> what has changed from 2.3 to 2.4 if you buy the 2.3 book. >> > > Yeah, I was looking at that, but it seems a little over my head right > now. I just didn't want to learn anything and then have to "unlearn" it. > I'm sure I will always be adding new things, so that isn't so much the > problem I guess. Python remains _extremely_ compatible from one minor version to the next (2.2 to 2.3, 2.3 to 2.4, ...) Python 3000 (which may well be Python 3.0) is allowed to break compatibility, _but_ it won't be conceptual compatibility; it will just discard "old stuff we no longer like." I would suggest you don't pay much attention to "old-style classes": class WhatEver: ... and only use "new-style" classes: class SomeClass(object): ... since the "old-style classes" are going away (the "class Name: ..." syntax will start defining new-style classes as well). Starting with 2.3 will put you quite near the modern edge, and the changes you will have to learn are not that great. People are still running code written under 1.5.2, so 2.3 is really quite modern.
--Scott David Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
