Hallöchen! "Fuzzyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> Ok, after brief eyeballing & experimenting, it appears that Wax >> is just what I was looking for. The code is simple, concise and >> trivially understandable, the level of wrapping seems about >> right, and examples are helpful. >> >> [...] > > That's good news. I'm about to start using Wax on a couple of > small(ish) projects - so it's nice to know about other users. Has Wax exceeded the critical mass so that one can be quite certain that it will still be maintained, say, next year? (Sincere question since I don't know.) Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus ICQ 264-296-646 -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
