Carl Friedrich Bolz: > Indeed, there are similarities to pyrex. Of course in pyrex you have to > give the types yourself, but since the type inference engine of PyPy can > sometimes be hard to understand this is maybe not the worst trade-off. > A nice advantage of the PyPy approach would be that you can test your > RPython code by running it on top of CPython until it works and only > then translating it into C. [...] > But as I said, this is all pretty unclear at the moment
Maybe PyPy can be used to allow a better linking between interpreted Python code and code compiled by ShedSkin. SS contains a good type inferencer that maybe can be useful to compile RPython too, aren't PyPy people interested in SS and its capabilities? Bye, bearophile -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
