Cameron Laird wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Kay Schluehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>                       .
>                       .
>                       .
> 
>>Lucid in the mid 80s that gone down a few years later. As it turned out
>>that time Lisp was not capable to survive in what we call today a
>>"heterogenous environment". It was strongly too self-centered. So I
> 
>                       .
>                       .
>                       .
> Smalltalk, too.  And, in a different way, Pascal.

I had the same thought.  Smalltalk is a wonderful environment but it 
doesn't really play well with others.  Smalltalk really wants to be 
*the* environment where the language is just a scripting tool within 
this larger environment of object manipulation, and it's really cool at 
that, but as a language for 'business apps' ina  heterogenous 
environment out it's own image, it's akward sometimes
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to