[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thank you all for your responses. That's exactly what I needed to know
> - how to bind a function to an object so that it would comply with
> standard calling syntax.
>
> This is largely a theoretical issue; I just wanted to improve my
> understanding of Python's OOP model. Using such features in real life
> code would probably be classified either as excessive magic or bad
> design.
or as a dirty-but-pragmatic workaround - just like accessing
implementation attributes. These are things that one should IMHO better
avoid if possible, but sometimes a simple hack is better than no
practical solution at all.
> Oh well, at least now I can be an informed participant of
> language holy wars :-)
Welcome on board !-)
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.split('@')])"
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
