On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 11:00:09 +0000, Matt Hammond wrote: >> 4: Can I avoid the dummy counter i in the for loop and do something >> like: >> yz=[y[:-1].x-y[1:].x] > > yz = [e.x for e in y] > yz.reverse()
I don't think that's what the O.P. actually wants. He seems to have misused slicing syntax as some sort of weird replacement for a for loop. Of course, I could be wrong. -- Steven. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
