[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote] > We use the standard logging package and frequently bump into performance > issues with it (we log a lot of information). When that happens, we then go > through our code and dump a bunch of logging calls we think we can live > without. This invariably causes problems because we get overzealous and > delete something we needed and are then unable to do some bit of post-mortem > debugging until we add back in the missing logging and cut another release. > > Before I consider writing something from scratch, is there something lighter > weight "floating around" out there already?
Do you have any profile information for where in the logging package the time is being spent? I don't know how much of a perf issue it is for you. Perhaps tweaking your usage of the logging package (perhaps using custom Loggers, Filters, outputters, etc.) could be made "good enough". Trent -- Trent Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
