Scott David Daniels wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Scott David Daniels wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> ... Is the Python debugger fairly stable? > >> Yes, but it is not massively featured. The "Pythonic" way is to > >> rarely use a debugger (test first and straightforward code should > >> lead to "shallow" bugs). Often for most of us judiciously placed > >> print statements suffice. > >> > >> > The one you get with Perl stinks on ice. More than > >>> anything else, I would like to have a powerful OO environment where I > >>> do not have to worry about the debugger sucking .... > >> Do watch your language on this newsgroup. Lots of people read this > >> group and there is no good reason to offend them. In turn, you will be > >> cut some slack. > > > > As one who avidly studies language, I have observed that the meaning of > > a word slip out of its original context through idiomatic usage. If I > > had included the implicit object of 'sucks', > > In fact I elided the "ass" from your original "sucks ass" in my original > quote, and now you carefully forget it in order to bolster your case.
D'oh! You are right. That's why I always liked BB Forums. You get to pull Big Brother 'rectifications'. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list