Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And of course, I was right. My solution seems to be faster than Paul's > one (but slower than bearophile's), be it on small, medium or large > lists. > > nb: A is mine, B is Paul's and C is bearophile's, and the number after > is the size of the list...
Interesting. I wonder if you could try it with a much larger number of distinct values in the list. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
