[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > For writing testcode, it looks like there's three ways that it's > typically done:
Actually, there's at least one more > (1). using the doctest module, > > (2). using the unittest module (i.e. "pyunit"), or else > > (3). just putting an "if __name__ = '__main__':" at the bottom of your > module containing code to manually run your class through its paces. (4) using pytest > So, which way is preferred? Seems to me that unittest is the way to go, > at least because it has you separate your test code from the code being > tested. Which may or may not be such a good thing... I prefer to have my tests with the code they're testing. > If unittest is the standard way to write test code, why do we still > have doctest? Because doctest is simple, great, and definitively more pythonic than unittest ? > (I notice there's no mention in PEP 3000 of deprecating > the doctest module). > Hopefully not. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list