Delaney, Timothy wrote: > However, there were definitely things found that were real bugs, and > subsequently fixed.
absolutely. but a significant chunk of those bugs were in the "will leak references or access null pointers under extreme low-memory conditions, but it's not very likely that you get here if that's the case" category. still bugs worth fixing, of course, but I'd be a lot more worried if Coverity had dug up 96 "makes it easy to crash python, or to run user-provided code" errors... (also note that Coverity works on the C level only, so potential bugs that involves *using* Python C API stuff in odd ways are not always found) </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
