[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > IronPython is currently nowhere near production quality. I would not > recommend it.
I know at least one firm developing production quality software using IronPython, so your statement 'nowhere near' is a bit off. They're pretty close to a full Python 2.4 implementation , and the list of bugs shrinks daily. It's not a project that's about to disappear either. Fuzzyman http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/index.shtml -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
