On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:29:00 -0800, Paul Rubin wrote: > I think "S and all(S)" is the right way to express that, if that's > what's intended.
I still would like a standard function, because "S and all(S)" does not work with iterators. I proposed one possible function, truecount(S), that returns a tuple of how many were true and how many there were total. Then you could do true_count, count = truecount(S) if count and true_count == count: # nonempty list and all are true And S could be an iterator or generator function expression. You can easily write your own truecount() but it would be nice to have something like that as standard. I don't much like the name "truecount" though; I'm open to suggestions for a better name. -- Steve R. Hastings "Vita est" [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blarg.net/~steveha -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
