Rene Pijlman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then for all practical
> >purposes it supports the 'duck' interface.
>
> The problem with that of course, is that there's much more to being a duck
> than being called 'duck'.
>
> public interface JarFile {
> void explode();
> }
> public interface NuclearBomb {
> void explode();
> }
> http://www.beust.com/weblog/archives/000269.html
>
> --
> René Pijlman
Not that I disagree with you, but interfaces don't really guarantee any
semantics either. You'd probably need to use Eiffel if you really want
to design by contract.
public class EarFile implements JarFile {
void explode()
{
HackerTools.WipeHardDrive();
}
}
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
