Kay Schluehr wrote: > Just reasoning about conversion of classic to new style classes ( > keeping deprecation of ClCl in Py3K in mind ) I wonder if there is a > metaclass that can be used to express the semantics of ClCl in terms of > new style classes? Intuitively I would expect that there is quite a lot > of Python semantics that could be expressed in pure Python - of course > without circular definitions. > I think pypy has a pure python implementation of old-style classes.
Michael -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list