Fredrik Lundh wrote: > Pierre Rouleau wrote: > > >>I can understand the design decision not to give object a __dict__, but >>I wonder if i'd be a good idea to have a class that derives from object >>and has a __dict__ to be in the standard library. > > > so you can replace one line of code in some of your programs with > an import statement ? >
ok... I should have said "something like the built-in object type" instead of "standard library"... -- Pierre Rouleau -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list