"vdrab" wrote: > Given this though, what other such beauties are lurking in the > interpreter, under the name of 'implementation accidents'? One of the > things that drew me to python is the claimed consistency and > orthogonality of both language and implementation, not sacrificing > clarity for performance, minimizing ad-hoc design hacks and weird > gotcha's, etc...
so anything you don't understand, and cannot be bothered to look up in the documentation, just has to be an inconsistent ad-hoc weird-gotcha design ? I think we can all safely *plonk* you know. </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
