> <snip> > There are those of us that need NaNs in production code, so it > would have to be something that could be configured. I find > that in my programs the places where I need to do something > "exceptional" with a NaN are very limited. The vast majority > of the time, I need them to propagate quietly.
Our programming expectations may differ, but an option to catch NaNs as an exception is a great idea. Regards, Ivan. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
