BartlebyScrivener wrote:
>>>Most IDEs are rather weak as text editors compared to emacsen.
>
>
> That's true, but even emacs and xemacs don't offer simple automatic
> word wrap (i.e. wrap a line without splitting words or putting an eol
> or hard carriage return at the end of every line). I don't know if vim
> allows this.
line-wrapping in an IDE ???
> It's something writers just take for granted in non-Unix
> text editors.
Ah, ok. It's about vim/emacs as a general text editor. Emacs provides
word-wrapping, but true, it split words. I maybe wrong, but I don't
think it would be that hard to make it more word-friendly.
Now I wonder: what the use for line-wrapping at first ? Both emacs and
vim are text *editors*, not text *formatters*. Might be a unix-vs-others
cultural difference, but the general use on unix is to use some markup
(tex/LaTex, html, ReST or any 'structured-text' variant etc) and the
appropriate formater/renderer for presentation stuff.
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.split('@')])"
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
