Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While I am quite sympathetic to this point, I have to say that > this horse left the barn quite some time ago.
I don't think so. Perhaps it's futile to go scouring the world for uses of the phrase "dynamic type" and eliminating them. It's not useless to point out when the term is used in a particularly confusing way, though, as when it's implied that there is some class of "type errors" that is strictly a subset of the class of "errors". Terminology is often confused for historical reasons, but incorrect statements eventually get corrected. > PS. Hi Chris! Hi! Where are you posting from these days? -- Chris Smith - Lead Software Developer / Technical Trainer MindIQ Corporation -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list