[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > | | > | (Unfortunately, you can hardly write interesting programs in any safe | > | subset of C.) | > | > Fortunately, some people do, as living job. | | I don't think so. Maybe the question is what a "safe subset" consists | of. In my book, it excludes all features that are potentially unsafe.
if you equate "unsafe" with "potentially unsafe", then you have changed gear and redefined things on the fly, and things that could be given sense before ceases to have meaning. I decline following such an uncertain, extreme, path. | So in particular, C-style pointers are out, because they can easily | dangle, be uninitialisied, whatever. sorry, the specific claim I was responding to is not whether *you* can easily misuse C constructs. I would refrain from generalizing your inability to write interesting correct programs in C, to a quality of the language itself. Rather, the claim I was responding to is this: (Unfortunately, you can hardly write interesting programs in any safe subset of C.) I would suggest you give more thoughts to the claims made in http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~sweirich/types/archive/1999-2003/msg00298.html -- Gaby -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list