Georg Brandl a écrit : > Nick Maclaren wrote: > >>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >>"Fredrik Lundh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>|> >>|> identical? you only applied @property to one of the methods, and then >>you're >>|> surprised that only one of the methods were turned into a property? >> >>I wasn't expecting EITHER to be turned INTO a property - I was expecting >>both methods to be the same, but one would have non-default properties >>attached to it. > > > That's another sign that property isn't intended to be used as a decorator. > Normally, decorators wrap functions with other functions.
Normally, decorators take a function and return anything appropriate. > property doesn't > return a function but a descriptor object. FWIW, function *are* descriptors (well, Python functions at least, cf the recent thread about pyrex functions). >>> def fun(): pass ... >>> fun.__get__ <method-wrapper object at 0x4041e1ec> >>> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
