Tim Williams wrote: > On 07/07/06, Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just did some testing between CherryPy's web server and lighttpd. > > My test was very simple and I used ab.exe for this purpose. > > CherryPy web server can serve about 140 simple request / second, while > > lighttpd can handle around 400 concurrent requests. > > > > > You haven't really said much about your requirements though. Perhaps > > > if you describe them in more detail (for example, what does "high > > > performance" mean to you?) someone can make a more useful recommendation. > > > > > Karrigell has an async server, in standalone mode it won't be as fast > as lighttpd but its simpler to use and code in than cherrypy. > However, it can also work behind lighttpd, so you might get a good > mix of server speed and fast development time. > > http://www.karrigell.com >
Yes, agree about Karrigell's quick development time - an almost flat learning curve if you've programmed for the web before, and none of the arcana which you can run into elsewhere. "high performance"? - I'm using it to provide an intranet for a small library with *three* networked computers - performance is impeccable! Gerard -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list