"guthrie" wrote: > But if (as I proposed..!) the user interface is better if presented as a > method. one could porovide convenience methods which would then > interface to these underlying library functions; yes?
but if it isn't? and why this obsession with superficial syntax details? there's a lot more to a language than what standard syntax it uses for trivial things... </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
