>>>>> Antoon Pardon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (AP) wrote: >AP> I'm sorry to see you missed it, but since I had answered this already in >AP> this thread I saw at the moment no need to repeat it: There would be no >AP> value for c, the line would raise an UnboundLocalError.
OK. That could have been chosen. But that would mean that instead of c.a = b, where c is bound in a non-local scope, you have to write something like: cc = c cc.a = b I don't find that useful. -- Piet van Oostrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL: http://www.cs.uu.nl/~piet [PGP 8DAE142BE17999C4] Private email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
