Arash Partow wrote: > That said, I believe at least one (most likely more) of > the hash functions in the group above will most always work > better (ala less collisions) than the standard default hash > available in the built-in dict for any random set of strings. > > Please feel free to prove me wrong :)
You have it backwards. You are the one making the positive assertion. You get to prove yourself correct. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
