Am 06.10.2010 13:40, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
Hi Andreas, I think it's fine if you discuss this on python-mode@
Changes in https://code.launchpad.net/~a-roehler/python-mode/python-mode-components Hi Barry, hi folks as rewrite of python-mode.el is conceived part of a larger project started at https://code.launchpad.net/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/ didn't change a single function but a bunch of them acccording to the rules applied. These rules might be and should be discussed, didn't find the right place for discussion so far. Lanchpads Blueprint seems rather fine-grained, not suitable for general reflections. Nonetheless I'd happy seeing python-mode Blueprint activated, as its fine for simple feature requests. Just the reason for changing `py-beginning-of-block' as an example. Rules applied :- have regular behaviour, meet and establish expectations as much as possible. Regular behaviour :- have regular return values Regular behaviour :- used options as respective functions use Return values :- if function moves point - return point Used options :- if function moves point - have a repeat count or no option The `nomark' option has been uncommon, probably singular in Emacs. No need for that. Using standard operations as moving point no need to read the doku should exist. Dropped the repeat count too for `py-beginning-of-block', as `py-beginning-of-block-or-clause' like `py-beginning-of-def-or-class' also has that except/irregularity as def/class switch. A well founded except/irregularity so far, kept and proliferated that. Cheers Andreas _______________________________________________ Python-mode mailing list Python-mode@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode
